Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 SW3D 492 - State v. Gillon

State v. Gillon’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2021

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

601997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Cabbage · 1 Smith & H. 7 - Copeland v. State · Potter v. State · 11 Smith & H. 388 - Hiller v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““the defendant, a resident of that general area of the county, was aware of the four-lane highway, the stop sign, and the distance from his point of entry through the median to the point of impact. Yet, despite having two clear opportunities, the defendant never slowed his truck as he drove over three lanes of traffic and a median strip. This, in our view, warranted the jury’s conclusion that the defendant was aware of and consciously disregarded the risk that a collision would occur.” 15 S.W.3d at 497 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “would need to determine the extent to which witness credibility was a factor in the case and the extent to which he had sufficient knowledge or records before him in order to decide whether the credible evidence, as viewed by the judge, adequately supported the verdict. If these determinations could not be made by the successor judge, the verdict could not be approved and a new trial should have been granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.