Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 SW3D 540 - Weatherred v. State

Weatherred v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

161
cited by 161 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

160 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weissbrodt v. White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona · McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. · United States v. Downing · Kelly v. State · Prystash v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 161 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] diplómate is a status that is bestowed on you by your peers, or the field that you're in, for ... contributions to the field, and it's basically a recognition that you've gone beyond the ordinary work, in order to contribute to the science or to the field or the community that you’re serving.” 2 . The Court of Criminal Appeals has explained that "hard” sciences are those "areas in which precise measurement, calculation, and prediction are generally possible, in-cludpng] mathematics, physical science, earth science, and life science,” while "soft” sci-enees “are generally thought to include such fields as psychology, economics, political science, anthropology, and sociology.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he appropriate questions are: (1) whether the field of expertise is a legitimate one, (2) whether the subject matter of the expert's testimony is within the scope of that field, and (3) whether the expert's testimony properly relies upon and/or utilizes the principles involved in the field.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.