Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 S.W.3d 626 - Hicks v. State

Hicks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 183rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Solem v. Helm · Harmelin v. Michigan · Rummel v. Estelle · Yagow v. United States · Tanner v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Inquiry Into Validity of Verdict or Indictment. Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the jury’s deliberations, or to the effect of anything on any juror’s mind or emotions or mental processes, as influencing any juror’s assent to or dissent from the ver- diet or indictment. Nor may a juror’s affidavit or any statement by a juror concerning any matter about which the juror would be precluded from testifying be admitted in evidence for any of these purposes. However, a juror may testify: (1) whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror; or (2) to rebut a claim that the juror was not qualified to serve.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “By generally prohibiting jurors from testifying as to matters and statements occurring during deliberations, rule 606(b) unquestionably makes proving jury misconduct in criminal trials more difficult than it was under prior rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the jury's deliberations”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.