Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 TC 299 - Sage v. Commissioner

Sage v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2009
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2009 · most notably Whipple v. Commissioner (1963), Millsap v. Commissioner (1966)

9 federal appellate ·

440195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Higgins v. Commissioner · Burnet v. Clark · Crane v. Commissioner · Lanski v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The petitioner has outlined many separate activities in which he participated from the time he was graduated from college until about 1946. There is testimony that he considered additional proposals which were brought to him during that time and that he was known as a person to whom such proposals might be brought profitably. Some of his activities may appear trivial and it may be inappropriate to fit some of the uses to which he put his time or money or both into the pattern of any business regularly carried on by him. But even if some are disregarded, enough are left to show that he was regularly carrying on a business. There may be difficulty or difference of opinion in defining that business properly, but it existed and was apparent.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.