15 Utah 2d 64 - State v. Louden’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 1993
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Ker v. State of California · People v. Stroble · State v. Crank · State v. BRAASCH
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no disposition to disagree with the doctrine that where police officers have obtained evidence by illegal methods, such as unlawful search in violation of the IV Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 14 of our Constitution, it should not be used to convict a person of crime, as held by the United States Supreme Court in Mapp v. Ohio .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Larocco“In the nature of things I accept the decisions of the Supreme Court, but reserve the right, until bondage `pre-empts' [emphasis added] it, to criticize them. I reserve to the citizens of my state the same privilege with respect to my opinions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the rights of citizens and the practical exigencies of police work,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Larocco
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.