Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 Va. App. 315 - Bolda v. Commonwealth

15 Va. App. 315 - Bolda v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2016

12 state decisions

70199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. Williams · United States v. Chadwick · Florida v. Jimeno · New Motor Vehicle Board of California v. Chevrolet Motor Division, General Motors Corp. · 4 Va. App. 53 - Williams v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] bare assertion that an item is believed to be a weapon will not justify a seizure of any item, particularly when the size, character or configuration of the item reasonably could not support the conclusion that the item was a weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.