Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 Wash. 534

State v. Miles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1896

Washington Supreme Court · decided 1896-11-16

<p>Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.— Hon. Norman Buck, Judge.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1908

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed · Decided 1896-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

¶2The defendant was convicted of larceny and has appealed. One of the errors complained of is the failure of the court to instruct the jury in writing, the defendant having requested the court to give written instructions. The charge given was partly written and partly oral, and for this reason the case must be reversed and remanded for a new trial.

¶3The fact that a stenographer was present, who took down the charge as given, was not a sufficient compliance with the statute. (Code Proc., §354, subd. 4.)

¶4Another error complained of was in relation to the impeachment of a witness. Testimony had been introduced to show that his reputation for truth and veracity was bad, and the witnesses were then asked whether from their knowledge of his reputation they would believe him under oath, and the court sustained an objection to the question. We think the weight of authority is now against permitting witnesses to tes*536tify to their opinions in this respect, and the objection was properly sustained.

¶5Hoyt, C. J., and Anders, Gordon and Dunbar, JJ., concur.

/15/wash/534 · .json · Public domain