15 Wash. 2d 297 - Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1994
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Poland v. Poland · In re Cave · State Ex Rel. Dunn v. Plese · Holcomb v. Holcomb · State ex rel. Ewing v. Morris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘[Alimony is] An allowance made to a woman for her support out of the estate or income of her husband, or of him who was her husband, upon her legal separation or divorce from him, or during a suit for the same. * * * ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martens v. Martens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.