15 Wash. App. 819 - Roper v. Mabry’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2019
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 75 Wash. 2d 894 - Samuelson v. Freeman · 2 Wash. App. 888 - Lucas v. Velikanje · 67 Wash. 2d 948 - Moon v. Phipps · 62 Wash. 2d 259 - State v. Swenson · 87 Wash. 2d 184 - Beckett v. Department of Social & Health Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The slandered party whose good name has been attacked is entitled to recover those damages which the law presumes must naturally, proximately and necessarily result from the publication of the slanderous matter.”); Romano v. United Buckingham Freight Lines, 4 Wn. App. 929, 934 , 484 P.2d 450 (1971); Brown v. Petrolite Corp., 965 F.2d 38, 43 (5th Cir. 1992) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the words ['thief,' 'steal' and 'embezzle'] are in common usage and any juror would be aware of their ordinary meaning”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.