Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 A3D 276 - State v. Flowers

State v. Flowers’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · California v. Green · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · United States v. Owens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our decision in Moore explained, ‘[u]nder § 3507, there is no requirement that the witness either affirm the truthfulness of the out-of-court statement, or offer consistent trial testimony.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.