Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 A3D 425 - Commonwealth v. Rosado

Commonwealth v. Rosado’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson · United States v. Cronic · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Bell Warden v. Cone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[There is a] distinction between errors which completely foreclose merits review and those which merely "narrow its ambit." Thus, [the Court] [has] held an attorney's failure to file a post-sentence motion preserving a particular sentencing claim "did not operate to entirely foreclose appellate review," but merely "waive[d] those claims subject to issue preservation requirements which were not otherwise properly preserved."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “waive[d] those claims subject to issue preservation requirements which were not otherwise properly preserved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.