State v. Solano’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2008
1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · Brady v. United States · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · 34 Cal. 3d 277 - In Re Ibarra
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“bargain may be strictly legitimate and free of extrinsic forces. [ Ibarra, 34 Cal.3d at 289 n. 5, 193 Cal.Rptr. 538 , 666 P.2d 980 (emphasis omitted).] [20] E.g., Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 644-645 , 96 S.Ct. 2253 , 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) whether the inducement to plead was proper, in that the prosecutor acted in good faith and had a reasonable case against any third party to whom leniency is promised ...; (2) whether there is a factual basis for the plea in terms of supportable evidence and proportionality of sentence; (3) whether the nature and degree of coercion and psychological pressure upon the defendant indicate the plea is involuntary; (4) whether the promise of leniency to another was a significant or insignificant concern to the defendant in his choice to plead guilty; and (5) whether any other relevant factor impermissibly influenced defendant’s plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Horning
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.