Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 ARK 612 - McHenry v. Vaught

McHenry v. Vaught’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 1968
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1968

6 state decisions

2019211930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. Phillippe · Vahlberg v. Keaton · Habach v. Johnson · Tompkins v. Vaught

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Where a lender places money with an agent to be loaned, with the understanding that he must receive the highest lawful interest, and that the agent must look to the borrower for his commissions, the circumstances necessarily impute knowledge to the lender of an usurious bonus received by the agent upon each loan.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.