In Re Hollis’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2018
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 349
Relies on Carolin Corp. v. Miller · Quattrone Accountants, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service · Furness v. Lilienfield · In Re Arena · In Re Orfa Corp. of Philadelphia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the debtor's admission of willful conduct; (2) the debtor's lack of credibility in denying willful conduct; or (3) adverse inferences drawn from the circumstances that indicate that repeated filings were intended as an abuse of the Bankruptcy Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Mullinix“According to 11 U.S.C. § 349, dismissal of a bankruptcy petition is without prejudice, except as provided in section 109(g).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.