Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 Cal. 114 - People v. Conness

People v. Conness’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
March 1964
most recently cited

4 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 1964

4 district · 16 state decisions

601906191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where he does not, directly or indirectly, place or leave her in the house, or connive at, consent to, or permit of her going there (using the word 'permit' in the same sense which we attribute to the word 'allow'), he must, to some extent, be an accomplice in her remaining there, after he has knowledge of the fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.