Ettefagh v. Ettefagh’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Addington v. Texas · Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · 28 Cal. 3d 908 - Department of Social Services v. Ronald P. · 19 Cal. 3d 278 - Liodas v. Sahadi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the trial court's factual findings regarding the existence and character of the parties' property under the substantial evidence standard. The trial court's selection of what legal principles to apply is subject to de novo review. [Citation.] This includes the choice of the applicable standard of proof, which is a question of law that we review de novo. [Citation.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.