Texaco, Inc. v. Rogow’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Heyman v. CBS, INC. (1979), Lanna v. Greene (1978)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sturtevant v. Sturtevant · Ives v. City of Willimantic · Connecticut Co. v. DIVISION 425 · Ingalls v. Roger Smith Hotels Corporation · Butler v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A term not expressly included will not be read into a contract unless it arises by necessary implication from the provisions of the instrument.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the fixed price option was rendered ineffective ... and the plaintiff had to accept the first refusal offer, as provided in the lease, or risk losing the right to purchase the property thereafter.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]f the terms of an instrument are fairly susceptible of two or more interpretations, the one which is the more equitable, reasonable and rational is to be preferred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.