Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 F.2d 3 - Kirk v. Siquier

Kirk v. Siquier’s Empirical Analysis

150 F.2d 3 · 1945

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
May 1970
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1970 · most notably Strand v. Schmittroth (1957), Hunter v. Martin (1948)

17 federal appellate ·

1001945195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ponzi v. Fessenden · Anderson v. Corall · United States v. Daugherty · Wall v. Hudspeth · Josias Pennington v. Lyman Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[sjentences in criminal cases should reveal with fair certainty the intent of the court and exclude any serious misapprehensions by those who must execute them. The elimination of every possible doubt cannot be demanded.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.