Beall v. Pinckney’s Empirical Analysis
150 F.2d 467 · 1945
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 1995 · most notably Salomon v. Kaiser (In re Kaiser) (1983), McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co. (1976)
8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110
Relies on Bay View Estates Corp. v. Southerland · Hill v. First National Bank · Kennedy v. First National Bank · Collins v. Collins · Monroe v. May, Weil & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The intent to do what the Constitution not only permits but provides is not an intention to hinder and defraud creditors within the meaning of the Florida Statute on that subject. Nothing has been taken from them to which they were entitled.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Every feoffment * * * transfer and assignment * * * by writing or otherwise * * * made or executed, contrived or devised of fraud, covin, collusion or guile, to the end, purpose or intend to delay, hinder or defraud creditors or others of their just and lawful actions, suits, debts * * * shall be from henceforth as against the person or persons * * * so intended to be delayed, hindered or defrauded, deemed, held, adjudged and taken to be utterly void, frustrate and of none effect * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coleman v. Alcock“whether there was a fraudulent purpose to hinder [a] creditor, or a good faith intention to provide a homestead for the family.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.