Swihart v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis
150 F.2d 721 · 1945
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1978
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Salinger v. Loisel · Wong Doo v. United States · Pope v. Huff · Rookard v. Huff · Ex parte Cuddy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Petitioner alleges 'that the questions now raised was not raised in the prior petitions No. 23268-W and 10.671.R.’ However, these matters were known to petitioner when he filed the petitions in 23268-W and 23721-R. If petitioner intended to rely on these matters he should have urged them in 23268-W. ‘To reserve them for use in a later proceeding “was to make an abusive use of the writ of habeas corpus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Price v. Johnston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.