Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 F.3d 467 - Corwin v. Johnson

Corwin v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

150 F.3d 467 · 1998

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
January 2025
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Davis v. Johnson (1998), Billy George Hughes v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,institutional Division (1999)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3401998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Jurek v. Texas · Ylst v. Nunnemaker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in fight of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In this Circuit, provided the state court conducted a full and fair adjudication of the petitioner's claims, pure questions of law and mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed under § 2254(d)(1).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “decision rested on a legal determination that was contrary to ... clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.