Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 F.3d 642 - Spicer v. Rossetti

Spicer v. Rossetti’s Empirical Analysis

150 F.3d 642 · 1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Ramsey v. American Air Filter Co. · Probus v. K-Mart, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While we recognize that “improper comments during closing argument rarely rise to the level of reversible error,” we believe that defense counsel’s comments here warrant reversal. Just as counsel may not express his beliefs regarding the honesty of the opposing party’s witnesses, he may not express his belief regarding opposing counsel’s opinions of honesty. These opinions have no place in a court of law, and defense counsel’s conduct was grossly in-appropriate____We cannot say that these comments might not have influenced the jury’s verdict; indeed since the case turned entirely on Spicer’s credibility, versus that of the guards, the improper comments were an egregious attack into the heart of the plaintiffs case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.