Jones v. Social Security Administration’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 404 (§ 204 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Califano v. Yamasaki · Nguyen v. Chater · Sullivan v. Everhart · Mercer v. Birchman · Philip Kerner v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) [a]n incorrect statement made by the individual which he knew or should have known to be incorrect; or (b) [f]ailure to furnish information which he knew or should have known to be material; or (c) ... acceptance of a payment which he either knew or could have been expected to know was incorrect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.