Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

150 F. App'x 282

Fuller v. Middleton

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-08-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2016

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Howard v. King · Adepegba v. Hammons · Reginald R. Brinkmann, Jr. v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-08-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM: *

¶1 Robert C. Fuller, Louisiana prisoner # 440355, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to reinstate his civil rights complaint. However, Fuller has failed to address the district court’s denial of the motion to reinstate and, thus, the issue is deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987).

¶2 Fuller’s appeal is -without arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir.1996). The district court previously dismissed one of Fuller’s actions as frivolous. See Fuller v. Calloway, No. 1:04-CV-2022-FAL (W.D.La. Dec. 27, 2004). Thus, Fuller has accumulated two strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Fuller is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will no longer be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

¶3 APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

¶4 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

/150/fappx/282 · .json · Public domain