Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 FRD 133 - Scholes v. Moore

Scholes v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
July 2010
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2010

50199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. · Rosario v. Livaditis · Secretary of Labor v. Fitzsimmons · Trotter v. Klincar

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.