Blum v. Schlegel’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2014
6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders · Herbert v. Lando · University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Faro v. New York University
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has the burden of making a particular and specific demonstration of fact, as distinguished from general, conclusory statements, revealing some injustice, prejudice, or consequential harm that will result if protection is denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.