150 F. Supp. 250 - Moore Oil, Inc. v. Snakard’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1976
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Bridges v. Wixon · Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission · United States Bilokumsky v. Tod · Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“', contained in the habendum clause meant that the lease would be extended so long as the premises were being developed or operated. Thus, continuous operations or development, carried on in good faith and with reasonable diligence, at a well commenced during the primary term would serve to extend the lease, even though there had been no production during the primary term. The leases before this Court are of the same effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“and as long thereafter as oil or gas, or either of them is produced from said land by the lessee,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Supreme Court of Oklahoma determined that the words `”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.