Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 ILLAPP 554 - Raab v. Raab

Raab v. Raab’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 1950
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1950

9 state decisions

40190919101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cole v. Cole · Harding v. Harding · Hunter v. Hunter · Jenkins v. Jenkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute, being in derogation of the common law, must be strictly construed, and nothing by way of intendment will be presumed. The wife seeking separate maintenance must by proof, supplemented with a finding, demonstrate that her case is within the statute, and that she is living separate and apart from her husband without her fault, before the court has jurisdiction to decree a separate maintenance.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.