150 Ind. App. 384 - Herman v. Ferrell’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2001
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 146 Ind. App. 404 - Beaman v. Hedrick · Lamb v. York · 116 Ind. App. 79 - Magazine v. Shull · Pickett v. Kolb · 141 Ind. App. 59 - RUST v. Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“.“It is within the trial court’s discretion to withdraw the submission of a cause from the jury where insurance has been interjected. If the trial court does not admonish the jury regarding the interjection of insurance during the trial and the admonishment is deemed necessary by one of the parties, an instruction should be tendered.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Antcliff v. Datzman““There can be no question but what a deliberate attempt on the part of counsel to inject insurance into a case would be reversible error.” 252 Ind. 252, 261 , 247 N.E. d 197, 203.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.