Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 Kan. 276 - Gray v. Johnson

Gray v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1975
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1975

8 state decisions

4019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Snehoda v. First National Bank in Wichita · First National Bank v. Schruben · Clark v. Layman · Lux v. Columbian Fruit Canning Co. · Lins v. Eads

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Few, if any, courts have gone further than this court in applying the doctrine of res judicata. It has been said repeatedly that a judgment entered in a prior action between the same parties who are litigants in a subsequent action and involving the same essential cause of action determines not only the matters formally stated as determined by the judgment, but all questions directly involved in the controversy which might have been raised in the prior action. . . .” (p. 279.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.