Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 KAN 864 - Ogle v. Freeman

Ogle v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
December 1986
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1986

8 state decisions

40193919401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williamson v. Ackerman · Riney v. Doll · Fritchen v. Mueller · Smith v. Bank of Hamlin · Graves v. O'Brien

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * and duress is still often defined as that degree of constraint or danger, either actually inflicted or threatened and impending, which is sufficient in severity or in apprehension to overcome the mind and will of a person of ordinary firmness”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * this court repudiated the proposition that ordinary firmness of mind should be included in the standard by which to test the existence of duress * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.