Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 KY 805 - Mason v. Manning

Mason v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1936
most recently cited

2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1936

2 district · 4 state decisions

30191219201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It would open the door to profligacy, chicanery, and corruption if the officers appointed to carry ■out the criminal law were permitted to stipulate by private contract. It would open a door to the escape of offenders by culpable supineness and indifference on the part of those officers, and compel the injured persons to take upon themselves the burden of public prosecutions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.