¶1This is an action of replevin of an engine and boiler. The property replevied was formerly owned by Reuben and Paris Rich, who in June, 1883, attached it to their factory in Charlton, and at the same time mortgaged it as personal property to the plaintiff. The Superior Court was justified in finding, from the fact of the giving of this mortgage, that the mortgagors agreed that the property should not become a part of the realty, but should remain personalty. The land upon which the building stood was under a mortgage to one Walker, at the time the property was attached to it. It was adjudicated in Carpenter v. Walker, 140 Mass. 416, that the property was personal property, and passed to the plaintiff under his mortgage. This adjudication was made upon the same state of facts existing in the case at bar, so far as the title of the plaintiff is concerned.
¶2The defendant, in some manner not disclosed, came into possession of the property after it was severed from the realty, but he does not claim any title to it, either under the Riches, or Walker, or anybody else.
¶3It was competent for the Superior Court to find that the property passed to the plaintiff under his mortgage, and that he is entitled to maintain this action, there having been a breach of the conditions of the mortgage; Carpenterv. Walker, ubi supra, and cases cited; and the exceptions taken by the defendant George L. Allen must be overruled.
¶4Exceptions overruled.