Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 MICH 590 - Danley v. Jefferson

Danley v. Jefferson’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1940
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1940

6 state decisions

3019081910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Hunt · In Re Probate of the Last Will of Beckett · Lansing v. Haynes · Lane v. . Lane · Cheever v. North

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Our statute does not specify publication as a requisite to the validity of a will.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.