Murphy v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
1921
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2019
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daniel Holden v. J a Stratton · Cohen v. Samuels · Hiscock v. Mertens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No credit is extended to the insured on the faith of the insurance, for all persons dealing with him are bound to know the law, and that money to become due thereon, when payable to a third person, is exempt from their claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“wholly destroy the intent of the statute and deprive beneficiaries ... of the protection the [Minnesota] Legislature intended to secure to them”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Soori-Arachi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.