Parker v. Tullos’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2019
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Key · Street v. State · Ex parte Bridewell · Ex parte Wray · Ex parte Pattison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have applied to this case the rule [of allowing bail] announced in Wray v. State, 30 Miss. 673 ; Moore v. State, 36 Miss. 137 ; Ex parte Bridewell, 57 Miss. 39 ; Ex parte Pattison, 56 Miss. 161 ; and Ex parte Hamilton, 65 Miss. 147 , 3 So. 241 . It cannot be said that the proof is evident, nor the presumption great, where there is found a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the prisoner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.