150 N.C. App. 86 - In Re Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Goss v. Lopez · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Bolling v. Sharpe · Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“have the opportunity to have counsel present, to confront and cross-examine witnesses supporting the charge, or to call his own witnesses to verify his version of the incident.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The proper standard for the superior court’s judicial review depends upon the particular issues presented on appeal. When •the petitioner contends that the decision of the agency, here the local school board, was unsupported by the evidence or was arbitrary or capricious, then the reviewing court must apply the “whole record” test. The “whole record” test requires the reviewing court to examine all competent evidence (the “whole record”) in order to determine whether the agency decision is supported by “substantial evidence.” Substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind would regard as adequately supporting a particular conclusion. When the petitioner argues that the decision of the agency violates a constitutional provision, the reviewing court is required to conduct a de novo review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reverse or modify the agency’s decision, or adopt the administrative law judge’s decision if the substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced because the agency’s findings, inferences, conclusions or decisions are: (1) In violation of constitutional provisions; (2) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency; (3) Made upon unlawful procedure; (4) Affected by other error of law; (5) Unsupported by substantial evidence ... in view of the entire record as submitted; or (6) Arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.