150 N.J. Super. 122
374 A.2d 1259
A.S., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. B.S., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1977-05-31
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1977-05-31
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably Miller v. Miller (1984), Mhb v. Htb (1985)
4 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Before Judges FRITZ, ARD and PRESSLER.
¶2Mr. Ira F. Back argued the cause for the appellant.
¶3Mr. George Warren, Guardian ad Litem, argued the cause pro se.
¶4PER CURIAM.
¶5The judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Lowengrub.