Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 N.J. Super. 185 - Biddle v. Biddle

150 N.J. Super. 185 - Biddle v. Biddle’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2000

14 state decisions

601977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on West Jersey Title & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Trust Co. · Williams v. Williams · 5 N.J. Super. 107 - Federbush v. Federbush · Joseph Harris & Sons, Inc. v. Van Loan · 54 N.J. Super. 555 - Welser v. Welser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Incarceration under R. 1:10-5 is part of the equitable process to enforce judgment, but is available only against a resistive suitor capable of meeting the judgment. The purpose of incarceration is to compel payment.... Incarceration is founded upon the court's conclusion from the evidence that, in conjunction with defendant's disobedience of the order, he clearly possessed the financial means but not the willingness to meet the order. [At 191, 375 A. 2d 285 ].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Incarceration ... is part of equitable process to enforce judgment, but it is available only against a resistive suitor capable of meeting the judgment. His ability to satisfy the judgment is his means of freedom.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.