Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 N.M. 268 - Concha v. Sanchez

Concha v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Oliver · Bloom v. Illinois · International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell · Turner v. Rogers · Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. Feiock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Criminal contempt proceedings are instituted to punish completed acts of disobedience that have threatened the authority and dignity of the court and are appropriate even after the contemnor is no longer acting contemptuously.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Because the purpose of [this type of] civil contempt sanction[ ] is to compel compliance with the court's orders and not to punish, the continuing contempt sanctions end when the contemnor complies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Coercive sanctions may include fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions designed to compel the contemnor to comply in the future with an order of the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.