State v. Guthrie’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
November 2024
most recently cited
38 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Commonwealth v. Durling · 7 Cal. 4th 1144 - People v. Arreola · State v. Brusenhan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the state’s evidence is uncontested, corroborated by other reliable evidence, and documented by a reliable source without a motive to fabricate, or possibly situations where the evidence is about an objective conclusion, a routine recording, or a negative fact, making the demeanor and credibility of the witness less relevant to the truth-finding process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Castillo“evidence is contested by the defendant, unsupported or contradicted, and its source has a motive to fabricate; it is about a subjective, judgment-based observation that is subject to inference and interpretation, and makes a conclusion that is central to the necessary proof that the defendant violated probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Castillo“[t]he trial court should focus its analysis on the relative need for confrontation to protect the truth-finding process and the substantial reliability of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.