150 Ohio App. 3d 664 - In Re Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Godinez v. Moran · State v. Berry · 116 Ohio App. 3d 237 - In Re Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“{¶ 10} “Juv.R. 32(A)(4) provides that the court may order a mental examination where the issue of competency has been raised. Bailey, 150 Ohio App.3d at 667 [ 782 N.E.2d 1177 ], ‘If the issue of competency is properly raised before trial, the trial court must hold a hearing on that issue and after considering the evidence presented by the parties at that hearing make a finding as to defendant’s competency. R.C. 2945.37(B), (C), (D), (E), and (G).’ Id. at 668 [ 782 N.E.2d 1177 ]; see State v. Ahmed, 103 Ohio St.3d 27, 37 , 2004-Ohio-4190 , 813 N.E.2d 637 , at ¶ 64 (‘R.C. 2945.37 requires a competency hearing if a request is made before trial’); [State v.] Were [ (2002) ], 94 Ohio St.3d [173], at 174 [ 761 N.E.2d 591 ].”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“{¶ 13} The standard enunciated in R.C. 2945.37 (G) governs the competency evaluations of juveniles, so long as it is applied in light of juvenile rather than adult norms. In re Johnson (Oct. 25, 1983), Montgomery App. No. 7998; Williams, supra. {¶ 14} Juv.R. 32(A)(4) provides that the court may order a mental examination where the issue of competency has been raised. Bailey, 150 Ohio App.3d at 667 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the right not to be tried or convicted while incompetent”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.