150 Or. App. 194 - State v. Najibi’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“coming in from the kitchen and by moonlight coming in from the living room windows and bedroom windows, which had no curtains). As many of the circumstances surrounding Sherl's opportunity to view the perpetrator counsel against reliability the absence of good lighting, the limited scope and duration of the viewing, and the effects of Sherl's injurythe evidence under this factor adds little to the scale to negate the suggestiveness of the pretrial procedures. B. Timing and completeness of the witness's description The second Classen factor is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the opportunity that the witness had at the time to get a clear view of the persons involved in the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“detailed description of the man's height, weight, skin color, eye color, hair color, hair and clothing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.