State v. Nam’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · State v. Thorne · 88 Wash. 2d 899 - State v. Partin · State v. Thorne · State v. Hickman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“language was omitted, the State was required to prove that the defendant unlawfully took personal property that was on or attached to another person. Id. ¶ 23 Mr. O'Donnell contends that the instruction here failed to identify all of the elements necessary for the jury to render a guilty verdict. But Mr. O'Donnell's argument is without merit. By omitting the in the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. O'DONNELL“The statute thus defines robbery to include two alternatives: taking from a victim's person or taking property in a victim's presence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. O'DONNELL“as taking personal property from the victim's person and similarly omitted the in the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. O'DONNELL
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.