Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 Pa. Super. 427 - Page v. Wilson

150 Pa. Super. 427 - Page v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2007 · most notably Moxley v. Comer (1983), Datlof v. United States (1966)

11 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

2201942195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. Walukiewicz · Pardee v. Markle · Chestnut Street Trust & Saving Fund Co. v. Hart · Risher v. Risher · Souder v. Schechterly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The debtor has the right to make the application in the first instance, and failing to exercise it, the same right devolves upon the creditor. When no application is made by either party, the law determines how the payments are to be applied in accordance with equitable rules and principles .... [I]t will apply the payment, when not appropriated by either party, in the way most beneficial to the creditor, that is, to the debt least secured, unless to the prejudice of a surety.””
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the law presumes, in ordinary cases, that the debtor intended to pay in the way at the time was most to his advantage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.