¶1(concurring).
¶2For the reasons assigned in the concurring opinion in the case of Fortenberry v. Scogin et al., La.App., 149 So.2d 732, I concur.
150 So. 2d 322
Decided February 22, 1963
Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1963-02-22
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1965
3 state decisions
Relies on 149 So. 2d 732 - Fortenberry v. Scogin
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1963-02-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1(concurring).
¶2For the reasons assigned in the concurring opinion in the case of Fortenberry v. Scogin et al., La.App., 149 So.2d 732, I concur.