State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Kelly · State v. Graham · State v. Stephens · State v. Cullen · State v. Boyd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court shall find a defendant to be a prior and persistent offender if: 1) the State pleads in the indictment or information, original or amended, or in the information in lieu of indictment, all essential facts warranting a finding that the defendant is a prior and persistent offender; 2) the State introduces sufficient evidence to warrant a finding that the defendant is a prior and persistent offender; and 3) the trial court finds beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is a prior and persistent offender.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson · State v. Johnson“No offense committed and no ... penalty ... incurred ... previous to or at the time when any statutory provision is repealed or amended, shall be affected by the repeal or amendment, but the trial and punishment of all such offenses ... shall be had, in all respects, as if the provision had not been repealed or amended, except: ... [t]hat if the penalty or punishment for any offense is reduced or lessened by any alteration of the law creating the offense prior to original sentencing, the penalty or punishment shall be assessed according to the amendatory law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Anderson · State v. Regot““[t]he court may sentence a person who has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of an offense ... to a term of imprisonment authorized by a statute governing the offense, if it finds the defendant is a prior offender ... or to an extended term of imprisonment if it finds the defendant is a persistent offender[J” Section 558.016.1.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wagner v. Bowyer · State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.