Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 SW3D 169 - Neal v. State

Neal v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana))

Relationships

Relies on Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Blackledge v. Perry · United States v. Goodwin · Texas v. McCullough · Bone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Except for complaints involving systemic (or absolute) requirements, or rights that are waivable only ... all other complaints, whether constitutional, statutory, or otherwise, are forfeited by failure to comply with Rule 33.1(a).'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As a prerequisite to presenting a complaint for appellate review, the record must show that . . . the complaint was made to the trial court. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.