Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 Tex. 333 - Burnaman v. Heaton

Burnaman v. Heaton’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

219
cited by 219 later decisions
7
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 203 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 219 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance (1995), Kennedy v. Hyde (1984)

9 federal appellate · 203 state decisions

6001951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. . King · Preston v. Hill · Rodriguez v. . Rodriguez · McMillan v. McMillan · Williamson v. . Williamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 219 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A valid consent judgment cannot be rendered by a court when consent of one of the parties thereto is wanting. It is not sufficient to support the judgment that a party’s consent thereto may at one time have been given; consent must exist at the very moment the court undertakes to make the agreement the judgment of the court.””
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““When a trial court has knowledge that one of the parties to a suit does not consent to a judgment, agreed to by his attorney, the trial court should refuse to give the agreement the sanction of the court so as to make it the judgment of the court. Any judgment rendered on the agreement under such circumstances will be set aside.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The power of .the court to render a judgment by consent is dependent on the existence of the consent of the parties at the time the agreement receives the sanction of the court or is rendered and promulgated as a judgment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.