Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 U.S. 70 - Magone v. Heller

Magone v. Heller’s Empirical Analysis

150 U.S. 70 · 1893

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2020 · most notably Magone v. Wiederer (1895), Sonn v. Magone (1895)

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

19018931900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mason v. Robertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “So, by force of the very clause in question, “all substances expressly used for manure, ” must be exempt from duty, even if they are chemical products, and are scientifically classed as one kind of an article the name of which appears in Schedule A, or are spoken of in commerce by that name. The agricultural use must prevail over the scientific or commercial nomenclature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Congress, for the promotion of agriculture, evidently intended that if a substance, which might be described by the name of an article subject to duty under Schedule A, was within the description, in the free list, of use for fertilizing the ground, it should be exempt from duty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he adverb 'expressly,' in its primary meaning, denotes precision of statement, as opposed to ambiguity, implication, or inference, and is equivalent to 'in an express manner' or 'in direct terms.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.